Match statistics snapshot
- Luton created the clearer chances on xG (0.32 vs 0.13, Δ 0.19).
- Luton fired more attempts (12 vs 2 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Luton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.32Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.13 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Luton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 144 |
| 535Lead | Total passes | 236 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Luton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Luton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Luton | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |