Match statistics snapshot
- Lyngby created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 1.01, Δ 0.48).
- Lyngby fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- FC Copenhagen was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 351 | Accurate passes | 452Lead |
| 440 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Fc Copenhagen |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.