Match statistics snapshot
- Hvidovre created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 1.67, Δ 0.23).
- Hvidovre fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Hvidovre was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Hvidovre |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.67Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Hvidovre |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 348Lead | Accurate passes | 345 |
| 443Lead | Total passes | 429 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Hvidovre |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Hvidovre |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Hvidovre |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.