Match statistics snapshot
- Lyngby created the clearer chances on xG (1.63 vs 0.62, Δ 1.01).
- Lyngby was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 20%).
- Silkeborg held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Silkeborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Silkeborg |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 518Lead |
| 341 | Total passes | 611Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Silkeborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Silkeborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Silkeborg |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |