Match statistics snapshot
- Lyngby created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 1.06, Δ 0.03).
- Lyngby fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- Lyngby was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 371Lead | Accurate passes | 315 |
| 462Lead | Total passes | 396 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |