Match statistics snapshot
- Viborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 2.19, Δ 0.97).
- Lyngby fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.19Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 272 | Accurate passes | 320Lead |
| 349 | Total passes | 390Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |