Match statistics snapshot
- Lyngby created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 0.54, Δ 1.03).
- Lyngby fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Lyngby was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 178 | Accurate passes | 349Lead |
| 260 | Total passes | 428Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Lyngby | Statistic | Viborg |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.