Match statistics snapshot
- Cumbayá fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Macara was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Macara | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Macara | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 282Lead |
| 334 | Total passes | 373Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Macara | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Macara | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Macara | Statistic | Cumbayá |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |