Macara vs Independiente del Valle
Key events
View all
Independiente del Valle- J. Sornoza
- A. Campana
MacaraFT 1–0
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Model blend
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- Macara10%
- Draw45%
- Independiente del Valle45%
Prematch market
Source: William Hill
- Macara29.7%
- Draw28.8%
- Independiente del Valle41.5%
Live market
No in-play odds snapshot was captured for this match.
Venue
Estadio Bellavista de Ambato
Ambato · Ecuador
- Address
- Avenida Bolivariana
- Surface
- grass
- Capacity
- 16467
Match
Rodrigo Oswaldo Leon Ramon
Championship Group - 3
- Referee
- Rodrigo Oswaldo Leon Ramon
- Round
- Championship Group - 3
- Date
Competition
League · Ecuador
- Country
- Ecuador (EC)
- Season
- 2026
- Dates
- 2026-02-21 → 2026-12-13
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
40%40%60%60%
Expected goals (xG)
0.9836%1.7664%
Total shots
1243%1657%
Shots on target
550%550%
Team form & competition
View all- #3Position
- 51Points
- 18-6-9W-D-L
- 45/34Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 3-0 / 1-4
- Worst defeats
- 0-3 / 4-0
- #1Position
- 74Points
- 25-2-5W-D-L
- 75/35Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 6-1 / 1-4
- Worst defeats
- 0-2 / 2-0
Previous match
Next match
Head to head
View all3Macarawins
4Drawsmatches
13Independiente del Vallewins
Recorded meetings: 20 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Independiente del Valle 4–4 Macara
- Macara most goals
- Independiente del Valle 4–4 Macara
- Independiente del Valle most goals
- Independiente del Valle 7–0 Macara
Independiente del Valle created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 1.76, Δ 0.78). Independiente del Valle fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots). Macara was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 31%). Independiente del Valle held more of the ball (60% possession).
Independiente del Valle underperformed their xG by 1.8 goals (0 scored vs 1.76 xG).