Match statistics snapshot
- LDU de Quito fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Macara was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 9%).
- LDU de Quito held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Macara | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Macara | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 388Lead |
| 315 | Total passes | 458Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Macara | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Macara | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Macara | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |