Match statistics snapshot
- Melbourne City fired more attempts (22 vs 11 shots).
- Macarthur was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 23%).
- Melbourne City held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Macarthur | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Macarthur | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 378Lead |
| 356 | Total passes | 436Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Macarthur | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 15Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Macarthur | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Macarthur | Statistic | Melbourne City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.