Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Haifa fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Beitar Jerusalem was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
- Maccabi Haifa held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 377Lead | Accurate passes | 251 |
| 462Lead | Total passes | 305 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.