Match statistics snapshot
- Beitar Jerusalem fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Maccabi Haifa was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 22%).
- Beitar Jerusalem held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 221 | Accurate passes | 423Lead |
| 309 | Total passes | 507Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.