Match statistics snapshot
- Gent created the clearer chances on xG (0.51 vs 1.72, Δ 1.21).
- Gent fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- Maccabi Haifa was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 0.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 300 | Accurate passes | 388Lead |
| 376 | Total passes | 477Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.