Match statistics snapshot
- Rennes created the clearer chances on xG (0.19 vs 1.55, Δ 1.36).
- Rennes fired more attempts (18 vs 5 shots).
- Rennes was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 0.19 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.55Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 276 | Accurate passes | 689Lead |
| 337 | Total passes | 746Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Haifa | Statistic | Rennes |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.