Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Netanya fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Maccabi Netanya was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 44%).
- Beitar Jerusalem held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Netanya | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Netanya | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 263 | Accurate passes | 457Lead |
| 333 | Total passes | 530Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Netanya | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Netanya | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Netanya | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.