Match statistics snapshot
- Ashdod was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 27%).
- Maccabi Petah Tikva held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Ashdod |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5Lead |
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Ashdod |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 258Lead | Accurate passes | 244 |
| 380Lead | Total passes | 345 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Ashdod |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Ashdod |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Ashdod |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.