Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Petah Tikva fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Beitar Jerusalem was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 15%).
- Beitar Jerusalem held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 229 | Accurate passes | 294Lead |
| 340 | Total passes | 403Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Beitar Jerusalem |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |