Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Petah Tikva fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Maccabi Petah Tikva was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Hapoel Hadera |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Hapoel Hadera |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 64% | Pass accuracy | 65%Lead |
| 249 | Accurate passes | 260Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 403Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Hapoel Hadera |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Hapoel Hadera |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | Statistic | Hapoel Hadera |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |