Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Tel Aviv created the clearer chances on xG (1.71 vs 0.40, Δ 1.31).
- Maccabi Tel Aviv fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Maccabi Tel Aviv was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 1.71Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.40 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 333 | Accurate passes | 400Lead |
| 429 | Total passes | 505Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.