Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Tel Aviv fired more attempts (21 vs 8 shots).
- Maccabi Tel Aviv was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
- Maccabi Tel Aviv held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 411Lead | Accurate passes | 300 |
| 466Lead | Total passes | 380 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |