Match statistics snapshot
- Rīgas FS created the clearer chances on xG (0.51 vs 1.87, Δ 1.36).
- Rīgas FS fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Maccabi Tel Aviv was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 0.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.87Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 370Lead | Accurate passes | 296 |
| 449Lead | Total passes | 385 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -1.10 | Goals prevented | -1.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |