Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Tel Aviv created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.08, Δ 0.27).
- Zorya Luhansk fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Maccabi Tel Aviv held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Zorya Luhansk |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Zorya Luhansk |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 445Lead | Accurate passes | 310 |
| 530Lead | Total passes | 383 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Zorya Luhansk |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Zorya Luhansk |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Maccabi Tel Aviv | Statistic | Zorya Luhansk |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.