Match statistics snapshot
- Macclesfield created the clearer chances on xG (1.21 vs 0.75, Δ 0.46).
- Macclesfield fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Crystal Palace held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Macclesfield | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 1.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Macclesfield | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 49% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 101 | Accurate passes | 433Lead |
| 206 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Macclesfield | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Macclesfield | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Macclesfield | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.