Match statistics snapshot
- Machida Zelvia created the clearer chances on xG (2.30 vs 1.21, Δ 1.09).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Albirex Niigata was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 2.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 306 | Accurate passes | 314Lead |
| 384 | Total passes | 394Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Albirex Niigata |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.