Match statistics snapshot
- Cerezo Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 1.91, Δ 0.14).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Machida Zelvia was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.91Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 193 | Accurate passes | 380Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 476Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Cerezo Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.