Match statistics snapshot
- Machida Zelvia created the clearer chances on xG (2.19 vs 0.48, Δ 1.71).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- FC Tokyo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 212 | Accurate passes | 458Lead |
| 297 | Total passes | 545Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Fc Tokyo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |