Match statistics snapshot
- Machida Zelvia created the clearer chances on xG (2.60 vs 1.95, Δ 0.65).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (18 vs 15 shots).
- Gamba Osaka was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.95 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 185 | Accurate passes | 457Lead |
| 268 | Total passes | 551Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.