Match statistics snapshot
- Machida Zelvia created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 1.15, Δ 0.68).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 72%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 211Lead | Accurate passes | 200 |
| 294Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Kyoto Sanga |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.