Match statistics snapshot
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima created the clearer chances on xG (0.23 vs 1.74, Δ 1.51).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima fired more attempts (15 vs 5 shots).
- Sanfrecce Hiroshima was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 0.23 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 180 | Accurate passes | 324Lead |
| 299 | Total passes | 453Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |