Match statistics snapshot
- Vissel Kobe created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 1.91, Δ 0.62).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Machida Zelvia held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.91Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 199Lead | Accurate passes | 185 |
| 298Lead | Total passes | 272 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |