Match statistics snapshot
- Madrid CFF W fired more attempts (19 vs 12 shots).
- Atletico Madrid W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 26%).
- Madrid CFF W held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Atletico Madrid W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Atletico Madrid W |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 341Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 440Lead | Total passes | 358 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Atletico Madrid W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Atletico Madrid W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Atletico Madrid W |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.