Match statistics snapshot
- Madrid CFF W fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Madrid CFF W was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 25%).
- Madrid CFF W held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Real Betis W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Real Betis W |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 561Lead | Accurate passes | 237 |
| 654Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Real Betis W |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Real Betis W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Real Betis W |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.