Match statistics snapshot
- Madrid CFF W fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Madrid CFF W was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 11%).
- Madrid CFF W held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Sporting Huelva W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Sporting Huelva W |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 53% |
| 532Lead | Accurate passes | 132 |
| 645Lead | Total passes | 248 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Sporting Huelva W |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Sporting Huelva W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Madrid Cff W | Statistic | Sporting Huelva W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.