Match statistics snapshot
- Magesi fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Amazulu was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 0%).
- Amazulu held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Magesi | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Magesi | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 326 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 400 | Total passes | 519Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Magesi | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Magesi | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Magesi | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.