Match statistics snapshot
- Magesi fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Magesi was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 20%).
- Cape Town City held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Magesi | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Magesi | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 116 | Accurate passes | 321Lead |
| 185 | Total passes | 403Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Magesi | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Magesi | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Magesi | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.