Match statistics snapshot
- Malmö FF W created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 1.48, Δ 0.18).
- Malmö FF W fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Malmö FF W was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.48 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 363 |
| 454Lead | Total passes | 448 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |