Match statistics snapshot
- Malmö FF W created the clearer chances on xG (3.34 vs 1.38, Δ 1.96).
- Malmö FF W fired more attempts (21 vs 12 shots).
- Malmö FF W was more accurate in front of goal (52% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 3.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 483Lead | Accurate passes | 146 |
| 565Lead | Total passes | 240 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Rosengård W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.