Match statistics snapshot
- Malmö FF W created the clearer chances on xG (5.70 vs 1.31, Δ 4.39).
- Malmö FF W fired more attempts (32 vs 9 shots).
- Malmö FF W held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 5.70Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 32Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 462Lead | Accurate passes | 223 |
| 554Lead | Total passes | 299 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 14Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmö Ff W | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |