Match statistics snapshot
- Mamelodi Sundowns created the clearer chances on xG (2.64 vs 0.38, Δ 2.26).
- Mamelodi Sundowns fired more attempts (21 vs 6 shots).
- Amazulu was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mamelodi Sundowns | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 2.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mamelodi Sundowns | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 553Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 610Lead | Total passes | 261 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mamelodi Sundowns | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mamelodi Sundowns | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -2.33 | Goals prevented | -2.33 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mamelodi Sundowns | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.