Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City fired more attempts (15 vs 5 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 40%).
- Manchester City held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 90% |
| 480Lead | Accurate passes | 397 |
| 530Lead | Total passes | 442 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |