Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 1.68, Δ 0.69).
- Inter fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.68Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 443Lead | Accurate passes | 325 |
| 512Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.