Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (2.35 vs 0.75, Δ 1.60).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (22 vs 13 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 2.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 597Lead | Accurate passes | 376 |
| 651Lead | Total passes | 437 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.20 | Goals prevented | 1.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |