Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (3.34 vs 0.29, Δ 3.05).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (14 vs 1 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 3.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 1 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 700Lead | Accurate passes | 200 |
| 755Lead | Total passes | 245 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| -0.53 | Goals prevented | -0.53 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.