Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (2.27 vs 0.30, Δ 1.97).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (26 vs 4 shots).
- Southampton was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 2.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 557Lead | Accurate passes | 201 |
| 619Lead | Total passes | 271 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.