Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (2.30 vs 0.43, Δ 1.87).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.43 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 656Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 723Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.