Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (2.78 vs 0.79, Δ 1.99).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.79 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 526Lead | Accurate passes | 409 |
| 587Lead | Total passes | 478 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.