Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (3.74 vs 0.35, Δ 3.39).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (20 vs 2 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 558Lead | Accurate passes | 384 |
| 616Lead | Total passes | 454 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |