Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 0.44, Δ 0.21).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Manchester City held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 602Lead | Accurate passes | 306 |
| 662Lead | Total passes | 369 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| -0.28 | Goals prevented | -0.28 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.