Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 0.61, Δ 0.25).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 9%).
- Manchester City held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 581Lead | Accurate passes | 278 |
| 644Lead | Total passes | 349 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -1.04 | Goals prevented | -1.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manchester City | Statistic | Wolves |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |